| Peer-Reviewed

Exploration of Responses of Victims Exposed to Medical Errors by Doctors in Khartoum State 2021-2022

Received: 15 August 2022    Accepted: 5 September 2022    Published: 16 September 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The aim of this study was exploring responses of victims toward medical errors committed by treating doctors in Khartoum State. The general objective is to explore the response of victims exposed to medical error and to identify the types of response. It was a community-based cross-sectional descriptive study. the study involves participants from the biggest three cities of Khartoum State. Data was collected by in-person interview using structured questionnaire. Data was analyzed by SPSS software programme. Frequencies and proportions were calculated and recurrent them for categorical data. The sample size was calculated to be 384. The study revealed that 76 (19.9%) of the participants were exposed to medical error. Approximately half of the participants who exposed to medical error either did nothing or talked to a friend and/or family about the error. Only four out of 76 filed their cases. In response to qualitative questions they claimed that after discovering the error and its effect their emotions ranged from anger to disappointment and fear. There was a diversity in the reasons of why some participants did not purse their legal rights and two of the four who have chosen to do so did not have a final closure of the file. One in five people can experience a medical error over the course of their life. Responses from different people when exposed to medical error come in different shapes and sizes. These responses range from being silent and talking with someone close to writing in newspapers and social media to sue the doctor in charge.

Published in International Journal of Education, Culture and Society (Volume 7, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11
Page(s) 231-235
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Medical Error, Patients’ Response, Complaints

References
[1] Macneill P and Walton M. Medical harm and the consequences of error for doctors. The Medical Journal of Australia. April 2002; 176: 222-225.
[2] Bari A, khan RA, Rathore AW. Medical errors: causes, consequences, emotional response and resulting behavioral change. Pak J Med sci. 2016; 32 (3): 523-28. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9701.
[3] Ramadan M and Al-Saleh K. Development of an Expert System for Reducing Medical Errors. International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications. 2013; 4 (6): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.5121/IJSEA.2013.4603
[4] CMS. Documentation/computer errors (NQF, 2011; AHRQ, 2018; CMS, 2018; Joint Commission, 2016; NHSN, 2019).
[5] Balch CM, Oreskovich MR, Dyrbye LN, Colaiano JM, Satele DV, Sloan JA, Shanafelt TD. Personal consequences of malpractice lawsuits on American surgeons. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Nov; 213 (5): 657-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 3. PMID: 21890381).
[6] Merry AF. How does the law recognize and deal with medical errors? J R Soc Med. 2009 Jul 1; 102 (7): 265–271. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2009.09k029.
[7] Amsiejute A. Medication Errors: Is it More Important to Find and Punish the Guilty One, or to Reduce the Likelihood of Recurrence of an Error? European Scientific Journal. April 2015; /SPECIAL/ edition 58-62.
[8] Sisson P. Do penalties reduce medical errors? https://centerforhealthjournalism.org/fellowships/projects/focus-do-penalties-reduce-medical-errors.
[9] Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error-the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016 May 3; 353: i2139. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2139. PMID: 27143499.
[10] Izadpanah F, Nikfar S, Bakhshi Imcheh F, Amini M, Zargaran M. Assessment of Frequency and Causes of Medication Errors in Pediatrics and Emergency Wards of Teaching Hospitals Affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences (24 Hospitals). J Med Life. 2018 Oct-Dec; 11 (4): 299-305. doi: 10.25122/jml-2018-0046. PMID: 30894886; PMCID: PMC6418340.
[11] Kathleen M, mazor, George W Reed, Robert A, Yood, MD, Melissa A, et al "Disclosure of medical errors: what factors influence how patients respond?" Journal of General Internal Medicine 21.7 (2006): 704-710.
[12] Birks Y, Harrison R, Bosanquet K, Hall J, Harden M, Entwistle V, et al. An exploration of the implementation of open disclosure of adverse events in the UK: a scoping review and qualitative exploration. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2014; 2 (20).
[13] Laarman BS, Bouwman RJ, de Veer AJ, Hendriks M, Friele RD. How do doctors in the Netherlands perceive the impact of disciplinary procedures and disclosure of disciplinary measures on their professional practice, health and career opportunities? A questionnaire among medical doctors who received a disciplinary measure. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 15; 9 (3): e023576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023576. PMID: 30878977; PMCID: PMC6429727.
[14] Chiruvella V, Guddati AK. Cyberspace and Libel: A Dangerous Balance for Physicians. Interact J Med Res. 2021 May 27; 10 (2): e22271. doi: 10.2196/22271. PMID: 34042594; PMCID: PMC8193490.
[15] Gallagher TH, Waterman AD, Ebers AG, Fraser VJ, Levinson W. Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the disclosure of medical errors. JAMA. 2003 Feb 26; 289 (8): 1001-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.8.1001. PMID: 12597752.
[16] Rapaport L. After medical errors, patients want doctors to hear them out. JAMA Internal Medicine, online October 9, 2017.
[17] Friedman LM. Impact: How Law Affects Behavior. Harvard University Press. 2016.
[18] Genn H and Beinart S. Paths to Justice: What People Do and Think About Going to Law. Cambridge University Press: 2000.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Dayro Yahia Salih, Fayhaa Salih Mohammed, Mohammed Elturabi Ajib, Dya Eldin Mohammed Elsayed. (2022). Exploration of Responses of Victims Exposed to Medical Errors by Doctors in Khartoum State 2021-2022. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 7(5), 231-235. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Dayro Yahia Salih; Fayhaa Salih Mohammed; Mohammed Elturabi Ajib; Dya Eldin Mohammed Elsayed. Exploration of Responses of Victims Exposed to Medical Errors by Doctors in Khartoum State 2021-2022. Int. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2022, 7(5), 231-235. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Dayro Yahia Salih, Fayhaa Salih Mohammed, Mohammed Elturabi Ajib, Dya Eldin Mohammed Elsayed. Exploration of Responses of Victims Exposed to Medical Errors by Doctors in Khartoum State 2021-2022. Int J Educ Cult Soc. 2022;7(5):231-235. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11,
      author = {Dayro Yahia Salih and Fayhaa Salih Mohammed and Mohammed Elturabi Ajib and Dya Eldin Mohammed Elsayed},
      title = {Exploration of Responses of Victims Exposed to Medical Errors by Doctors in Khartoum State 2021-2022},
      journal = {International Journal of Education, Culture and Society},
      volume = {7},
      number = {5},
      pages = {231-235},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijecs.20220705.11},
      abstract = {The aim of this study was exploring responses of victims toward medical errors committed by treating doctors in Khartoum State. The general objective is to explore the response of victims exposed to medical error and to identify the types of response. It was a community-based cross-sectional descriptive study. the study involves participants from the biggest three cities of Khartoum State. Data was collected by in-person interview using structured questionnaire. Data was analyzed by SPSS software programme. Frequencies and proportions were calculated and recurrent them for categorical data. The sample size was calculated to be 384. The study revealed that 76 (19.9%) of the participants were exposed to medical error. Approximately half of the participants who exposed to medical error either did nothing or talked to a friend and/or family about the error. Only four out of 76 filed their cases. In response to qualitative questions they claimed that after discovering the error and its effect their emotions ranged from anger to disappointment and fear. There was a diversity in the reasons of why some participants did not purse their legal rights and two of the four who have chosen to do so did not have a final closure of the file. One in five people can experience a medical error over the course of their life. Responses from different people when exposed to medical error come in different shapes and sizes. These responses range from being silent and talking with someone close to writing in newspapers and social media to sue the doctor in charge.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Exploration of Responses of Victims Exposed to Medical Errors by Doctors in Khartoum State 2021-2022
    AU  - Dayro Yahia Salih
    AU  - Fayhaa Salih Mohammed
    AU  - Mohammed Elturabi Ajib
    AU  - Dya Eldin Mohammed Elsayed
    Y1  - 2022/09/16
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11
    T2  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
    JF  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
    JO  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
    SP  - 231
    EP  - 235
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3363
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220705.11
    AB  - The aim of this study was exploring responses of victims toward medical errors committed by treating doctors in Khartoum State. The general objective is to explore the response of victims exposed to medical error and to identify the types of response. It was a community-based cross-sectional descriptive study. the study involves participants from the biggest three cities of Khartoum State. Data was collected by in-person interview using structured questionnaire. Data was analyzed by SPSS software programme. Frequencies and proportions were calculated and recurrent them for categorical data. The sample size was calculated to be 384. The study revealed that 76 (19.9%) of the participants were exposed to medical error. Approximately half of the participants who exposed to medical error either did nothing or talked to a friend and/or family about the error. Only four out of 76 filed their cases. In response to qualitative questions they claimed that after discovering the error and its effect their emotions ranged from anger to disappointment and fear. There was a diversity in the reasons of why some participants did not purse their legal rights and two of the four who have chosen to do so did not have a final closure of the file. One in five people can experience a medical error over the course of their life. Responses from different people when exposed to medical error come in different shapes and sizes. These responses range from being silent and talking with someone close to writing in newspapers and social media to sue the doctor in charge.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Community Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum North, Sudan

  • Department of Community Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum North, Sudan

  • Department of Community Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum North, Sudan

  • Department of Community Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum North, Sudan

  • Sections